China Mills

Strategic universality in the making of global guidelines for mental health

(January 2022)

Mills, C. (2022), Transcultural Psychiatry pp. 136346152110686–136346152110686. doi:10.1177/13634615211068605.

Abstract:

Based on interviews with members of the Guideline Development Group (GDG) of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) Guidelines for Mental, Neurological and Substance Use Disorders, this article adds empirical depth to understanding the contingent and strategic nature of universality in relation to mental health. Differently from debating whether or not mental health is global, the article outlines the people, ideas, and processes involved in making it global. Read more

Strategic universality in the making of global guidelines for mental health Read More »

Burden and benefits-related suicides: “misperception” or state crafted reality?

(January 2022)

Mills, C. (2022). Journal of Public Mental Health, 21(1), pp. 46–56. doi:10.1108/jpmh-09-2021-0124.

Abstract:

This article aims to focus on deaths by suicide in relation to UK welfare reform as a case study to question one of suicidology’s most dominant theories – the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide (Joiner, 2005) and its influential ideas on “perceived burdensomeness” – as well as wider ideologies on suicide and mental health reflected in this approach. Design/methodology/approach This article draws on evidence from disabled people’s campaigning groups (primary sources) and research literature (secondary sources), which shows the negative psychological impact of burden discourse and how this shows up in people’s accounts of feeling suicidal, in suicide notes and in family accounts of those who have died by suicide. It uses this evidence to problematise the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide (Joiner, 2005), specifically its ideas about “burden” as an individual misperception, and the assumption that suicide is always the outcome of mental health problems. Read more

Burden and benefits-related suicides: “misperception” or state crafted reality? Read More »

Affective technologies of welfare deterrence in Australia and the United Kingdom

(2021)

Mills, C. and Klein, E. (2021). Economy and Society, 50(3), pp. 397–422 doi:10.1080/03085147.2021.1875692.

Abstract:
Across the political spectrum of different historical periods, welfare deterrence has shaped social security and immigration policy in both Australia and the United Kingdom. Deterrence discourages access to state welfare through the production and mobilization of negative affect to deter specific groups from claiming state support, and by crafting public affect (of fear and disgust) about these target populations in order to garner consent for punitive policies. In this paper, we argue that deterrence works as a human technology where the crafting of negative affect operates as a technology of statecraft. Through critical juxtaposition and multiple genealogies of deterrence, this paper meshes time and space, and colony/colonizer and metropole, to show the historical and contemporary connectivity of the affective nature of deterrence. We identify five main operations that produce the ‘feel’ of deterrence: stigmatization by design, destitution by design, deterrent architecture, the control of movement, and the centrality of labour; as well as tracing the political economy of deterrence. Read more

Affective technologies of welfare deterrence in Australia and the United Kingdom Read More »

A critical review of the Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development: Time for a paradigm change

Cosgrove, L., Mills, C., Karter, J. Mehta, A., Kalathil, J. (2019). A critical review of the Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development: Time for a paradigm change. Critical Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2019.1667488

Abstract:

In October 2018, the UK government, positioning itself as a global leader in mental health, hosted a Global Ministerial Mental Health Summit. The event was scheduled to coincide with the publication of the Lancet Commission on Global Mental Health and Sustainable Development. Despite claiming a public health and social determinants approach, the report focused on the importance of ‘closing the treatment gap’ through the use of Western diagnostic tools and interventions. In response, coalitions of mental health activists and service-users organised open letters detailing their concerns with the summit and report. Among these concerns were the ways in which recent UK government policies, particularly welfare reform, violated the rights of persons with disabilities; the lack of stakeholder representation and involvement in the report; and the continuation of the colonial legacy in which the ‘North drives the South.’ Expanding on the concerns raised by this coalition of activists and service-users, we argue that a focus on societal (structural) determinants and political economy could open new possibilities for global mental health beyond narrow individualized interventions. Additionally, we suggest that a politically informed societal determinants of health framework is needed in order to move the Global Mental Health Movement in a more emancipatory direction.

A critical review of the Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development: Time for a paradigm change Read More »

Global Mental Health

Cosgrove, L., Mills, C, Amsterdam, J., Heath, I., Mehta, A., Kalathil, J., & Shaughnessy, A. The Lancet, 2019 Jul 13;394 (10193): 117-118.

To enhance the commitment of the Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development set out by Vikram Patel and colleagues1—to reframe the global mental health agenda within the broader conceptualisation of mental health, envisioned in the Sustainable Development Goals—we offer some suggestions for further reform. Read more

Global Mental Health Read More »

From ‘Invisible Problem’ to Global Priority: The Inclusion of Mental Health in the Sustainable Development Goals

(2018)

Mills, C. (2018). Development and Change,49(3), pp. 843–866: doi:10.1111/dech.12397

Perceptions regarding the importance of mental health are shifting at a global level. Once described as an ‘invisible problem’ in international development, mental health is now being framed as one of the most pressing development issues of our time. Concern over the historical absence of mental health from the development agenda — despite its being regarded as a major obstacle to development — has led to its recent inclusion in the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This article critically examines three intersecting axes key to its inclusion in the SDGs: 1) the conceptualization and calculation of the contribution of mental disorder to the global burden of disease; 2) the quantification of mental disorder as an economic burden; and 3) the relationship between mental distress and poverty. The article highlights the urgent need to foster a more nuanced understanding of the interplay between mental health and development, and shows how, at times, interventions in the two fields work together in producing reductionist, economistic, individualized and psychologized responses to poverty. Read more

From ‘Invisible Problem’ to Global Priority: The Inclusion of Mental Health in the Sustainable Development Goals Read More »

‘Dead people don’t claim’: A psychopolitical autopsy of UK austerity suicides

(2017)
Mills, C. (2018). Critical Social Policy, 38(2), pp. 302–322: doi:10.1177/0261018317726263

Abstract:
One of the symptoms of post financial crisis austerity in the UK has been an increase in the numbers of suicides, especially by people who have experienced welfare reform. This article develops and utilises an analytic framework of psychopolitical autopsy to explore media coverage of ‘austerity suicide’ and to take seriously the psychic life of austerity (internalisation, shame, anxiety), embedding it in a context of social dis-ease. Read more

‘Dead people don’t claim’: A psychopolitical autopsy of UK austerity suicides Read More »

The (Mis)appropriation of HIV/AIDS advocacy strategies in Global Mental Health: towards a more nuanced approach

2017)
Howell, A., Mills, C. and Rushton, S. (2017) Globalization and Health, 13(1): doi:10.1186/s12992-017-0263-3

Abstract:
Mental health is increasingly finding a place on global health and international development agendas. Advocates for Global Mental Health (GMH), and international organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Bank, argue that treatments available in high-income countries should also be made available in low- and middle-income countries. Such arguments are often made by comparing mental health to infectious diseases, including the relative disease and economic burdens they impose, and pointing to the applicability of the right to access treatment for mental health, not only infectious diseases. HIV/AIDS advocacy in particular has been held up by GMH advocates as offering an appropriate strategy for generating global commitment. Read more

The (Mis)appropriation of HIV/AIDS advocacy strategies in Global Mental Health: towards a more nuanced approach Read More »